|
Posted By
|
 | Dan Hutcheson (Fellow)
|
|
|
Post Date
|
2009-12-28 09:32:32
|
|
Comment
|
Good catch Venture Gene, I checked and the data is not a typo. It's not the math that's fishy, it's the measurements. 1st, the RM/egg figure is purchasing power and the RM/$ is exchange rate rated. There is no purchasing power parity equivalent. 2nd, The data was probably measured at different times of the year, which with the rapid price changes could account for much of the difference. 3rd, exchange rates couldn't keep up with the internal changes due to information latency. |
|
|
|